“Your updates are always the wins. We’d back you a lot harder if we heard the part you’ve been carrying alone.”
Every year, your forum gets better...or drifts.
Once a year, every member reviews every member. Feedback is reworded so it's anonymized, constructive, and actionable.Each of you gets a personal report on your strengths, weaknesses, and opportunities to grow — and the forum gets a scorecard on itself.About 30 minutes per person, once a year.
$499 per forum per year (one-tenth the cost of a retreat facilitator) · self-serve
“I've been in forums since 2009 and they have changed my life in so many ways.Some of my forum members know me better than my closest friends, but so much goes unspoken.People don't realize they are stuck in loops. Or how they come across to the group. Or even just all the positive things that everyone feels about them.Doing 360s for my own forum groups has been transformational, and helped all of us grow, get unstuck, and ensure the forum stays healthy.”
Andrew Wilkinson
Co-Founder of Tiny.
5 forums on Forum 360. In them since 2009.
What a forum is
In EO and YPO, a forum is 6–10 entrepreneurs who meet every month, in confidence, for years. Same people. Same room. They talk about the real stuff — the business, the marriage, the thing they can't say to the board.
That's the room this is for.
WHAT COMES BACK
The things your forum already knows, and finally has a way to say.
Composites, for illustration. Yours are built from your own forum’s answers, reworded so no one can tell who said what.
“Your advice is the sharpest in the room. The year you start taking it, this forum levels up.”
“Every time it gets heavy, you reach for the joke. It always lands. We’d trade the laugh for the ten seconds before it, once in a while.”
“You’ve brought the same problem for five years. Maybe you don’t need more advice. Maybe you need one of us to sit with you while you decide.”
“The rare times you push back are the best minutes this forum gets all year. We can take it now — do it more.”
“You’re the reason this forum still exists. Nobody’s said it out loud. Here it is in writing, so next year you build on it.”
From a report
“You’re the reason this room feels safe — and the first to reach for a joke when it stops feeling that way. The group has learned to let you.”
THE HONEST PART
Great forums don’t fail. They slowly drift.
Year 1
Someone cried at the second meeting. You canceled a board call to make the retreat. You drove home buzzing, half-terrified by how honest it got. The room was building something, and everyone could feel it.
Year 5
The trust is real. The friendships are real. And the feedback has quietly gone comfortable. Updates run a little long, the same two people do most of the reaching-out, and nobody’s failing. The room just stopped getting sharper, and no one has a way to tell.
You know what this room is worth.
Seven people, three hours a month, for years — 2,500 person-hours of the most expensive attention any of you can give. It’s saved a sale and caught a diagnosis early.
There’s no other room like it in your life.
The only instrument the room has is attendance. It tells you people show up — not whether the feedback lands, whether trust is climbing, whether the room is getting better. This can.
HOW IT WORKS
30 minutes a person — a stronger forum, and proof it’s working.
Set it up in five minutes.
Paste your members’ emails, pick a window, hit start. Everyone signs in with a magic link — no passwords, no app to install. Then step back. Forum 360 chases the stragglers, not you: we send every invite and reminder, the day-three nudge and the two-days-left warning, straight to each member. You never text a grown man about a survey; you watch the checkmarks fill in.
Everyone reviews everyone.
Each member rates and writes about every other member across eight dimensions, rates themselves on the same eight, and answers a short set of questions about the forum itself. About 30 minutes per person, once a year.
Every word passes through the rewording gate.
Before anyone sees anything, AI paraphrases every comment. Your phrasing, your tells, the expression you always use: gone. Then feedback is combined across reviewers, so what surfaces is the pattern, never the person.
The reports land.
Each member privately receives a personal report: candid, and written to help rather than sting. The group receives a shared forum-health report built to be discussed at your next meeting. Web and PDF, designed like something you’d keep. Every cycle stacks on the last. The reports don’t just tell you where you stand this year, they show you which way you’re moving.
THE PART TO BE SKEPTICAL ABOUT
“Anonymous” is usually a promise. Here it’s built in.
Most “anonymous” surveys are anonymous the way an unlocked diary is private. Forum 360 is built so nothing traces back to you — not for the organizer, not for the group, not even for us:
Your exact words never appear.
Every comment gets reworded before anyone sees it. What lands in a report is the point, never the person.
We couldn’t leak your words if we tried.
The moment your answers are reworded, the originals are permanently deleted. There’s no vault to guard and no promise to keep. What you typed simply no longer exists.
Too few voices, no report.
If fewer than 3 members review someone, that report is never created. A report built on two opinions isn’t anonymous, so it never exists — for you or about you.
The organizer sees checkmarks. Only checkmarks.
Whoever runs the cycle sees one thing: who’s finished and who needs a reminder. What anyone wrote stays invisible to them, including anything written about them.
A small room is the fear we hear most, so here’s the honest answer.
Every line in a report blends at least 3 members’ answers into one voice, reworded. What you read is what several people saw — so even in a room of six or eight, there’s no sentence to trace back, because no single sentence went in.
THE REPORTS
Wording that names the thing, without making it personal.
Every member gets a report that reads like a sharp friend who’s been in the room for years.
Yours, privately.
- How the people who’ve watched you for years actually experience you, across all eight dimensions.
- Where your self-ratings and the group’s ratings split. The gap is usually where the report earns its keep.
- The blind spot everyone named independently.
- The place the room has been ready to help you, and waiting for you to ask.
- What to do about it — written for a specific person, not a percentile.
The forum’s, together.
- What the group thinks of the group: trust, candor, freshness, whether meetings still go anywhere.
- The topics the room is routing around.
- A ready-made agenda for the meeting where the forum turns the lens on itself.
- Presence
- In the room, or just in the chair?
- Preparation
- Does your update respect six other calendars?
- Openness & vulnerability
- The real thing, or the version that’s easier to say out loud?
- Quality of contribution
- Questions that move people, or airtime?
- Freshness
- Same update, different month — or is the forum meeting the current you?
- Trust & confidentiality
- Does the room believe what’s said here stays here?
- Candor & challenge
- Do you say the hard thing, or wait out the silence?
- Blind spots
- What everyone sees that you don’t.
TRACK PROGRESS OVER TIME
Year one is a mirror. Year five is a scoreboard.
A forum that’s met for ten years remembers itself in inside jokes and a couple of legendary meetings. Forum 360 gives it a memory with numbers. The first cycle is a snapshot. Every cycle after that is the room watching itself get better.
Trend lines on all eight dimensions
Presence, candor, trust, freshness — plotted year over year. You stop guessing whether the room is sharper than last year and start seeing the line.
Your journey, privately
A page only you can see: the gap between how you rate yourself and how the room rates you, and whether it’s closing.
The forum timeline
Every cycle, every report, the written history of a group that used to live in memory. The year candor jumped, in writing.
The year you can point to the line and say:we're making each other better.
THE MORNING AFTER
Naming it is the easy part. Holding the room is the rest.
Honest feedback is only half the job. The other half is what happens after it lands. Forum 360 is built for that morning, not just the courage to write the thing down.
It lands in one inbox.
Every report goes to the person it’s about — nobody else. You read yours alone, before a word is said in the room.
You get to sit with it.
It reads like a sharp friend, not a verdict — no score to lose, no ranking to place in. You have time with it before anyone asks how it landed.
The forum works through it together.
The shared forum-health report comes with a ready-to-run agenda for the one meeting a year where the forum talks about itself. The hard conversation has rails, and nobody’s left alone with what they read.
FOR THE ORGANIZER
You brought in the mirror. You don’t have to hold the hard news.
The thing that scares most organizers isn’t the feedback — it’s being blamed for the sting. Forum 360 takes that off your plate two ways:
You set the cycle in motion. The reports do the talking.
Nobody’s words trace back to a person, and no hard truth arrives in your voice, so you’re not the messenger anyone shoots. If a report stings, you’re not improvising either: Forum 360 hands you a moderator playbook for the follow-up, how to open it and when to say less.
WHY THIS EXISTS
I built this to make my own forum better.
I joined my first forum in 2009, through Entrepreneurs' Organization. Six entrepreneurs in a conference room once a month. I didn't think I'd get much out of it. Most of my forum members were older than me and in completely different industries. Instead, that room walked its members through business-partner breakups, sales, health scares, and the hardest calls of their careers. When I needed executors for my will, I picked two of my forum mates—the same ones I thought I wouldn't learn much from.
A few years ago I ran a full 360 review on myself — I asked the people who knew me best to tell me the truth about how I come across. What came back was sharper than anything I’d heard in years, and it changed how I showed up. The strange part: almost none of it should have been news.
The people in my forum had watched me do all of it, for years. There’d just never been a safe way to say it, so nobody did.
Forum 360 is the safe way. I built it for my own forum first, to take a great room and make it greater.
Now it runs for yours.
Andrew Wilkinson
Co-Founder, Tiny · 5 forums on Forum 360 · in them since 2009
PRICING
$499 a year. The whole forum. That’s the pricing page.
One annual cycle for up to 12 members, self-serve from start to report. No seats, no tiers, and nobody will ever email you to “hop on a call.”
What the $499 covers
- The full cycle for every member — invites, reminders, magic-link sign-in, organizer dashboard.
- A personal report for each member, on the web and as a PDF worth keeping.
- The shared forum-health report, built to run as a meeting.
- The anonymity machine: AI rewording, database-enforced separation, thin reports suppressed.
- Year-over-year trends, private journey pages, and the forum timeline as your history accrues.
The math, since you’re the one expensing it.
You spent more on wine at the last retreat.
$499 across seven members is about $71 a person, per year — about $25 per monthly meeting, for the entire room.
A retreat facilitator costs ten times this, visits once, and forgets you. This runs every year and remembers everything.
Run your forum’s first 360
Add your members first. You pay $499 when you start the cycle. Billed annually, plus applicable tax calculated from your billing address, and renews automatically until canceled. One complete review each year. Your history always stays.
WHO IT'S FOR
Which forum is yours?
The great one that wants to stay great
Deep trust, real friendships. Give it an instrument so it keeps getting sharper instead of coasting on chemistry.
The self-run forum
No HQ, no trained moderator, no tools. This is the structure you’ve been improvising, run for you.
The one that wants proof it’s working
You feel like the room is good. This turns the feeling into a number you can point to, year over year.
BEFORE YOU BRING IT TO YOUR FORUM
The honest questions.
Can the organizer read my answers?
No. The organizer dashboard can query exactly one thing: who has finished. It has no path to anyone’s answers — not yours, not their own. Raw responses are reworded and combined before any report is built, and there’s no admin screen, anywhere, that shows what a person wrote.
Could someone still figure out who said what?
Not from the words: every comment is rewritten before it appears anywhere, so phrasing, tone, and pet expressions don’t survive. Not from the numbers either: ratings appear only in aggregate, and if fewer than 3 people review someone, that report isn’t generated at all. The one honest limit: if a member has voiced a particular view out loud for years, no software can disguise a worldview. Nothing else in a report points at a person.
What if one member won’t do it?
It happens — and usually it’s the member the forum most wants to hear from. Three things help. The ask is about 30 minutes per person, once a year, while everyone else is doing it. Fewer voices mean thinner reports for the people they care about, so opting out is visible. And the anonymity protects them exactly as much as everyone else. Most forums put the deadline on a meeting agenda and get to 100%. And honestly: a member who won’t spend about 30 minutes per person, once a year, isn’t a data problem. That’s a finding.
Is this going to blow up our forum?
It didn’t blow up the founder’s forum, and the design pushes the other way. Nothing arrives raw. Every comment is reworded, combined across reviewers, and delivered privately, so nobody’s ambushed in front of the group. But the real question deserves a straight answer: if a forum can’t handle honest feedback delivered kindly and anonymously, it already has a problem, one that’s compounding quietly instead of getting handled.
Why pay $499 for something a Google Form could do?
You can run a free survey. Here’s what happens: everyone knows the moderator can open the raw responses, so everyone writes the version of the truth they’d be comfortable being caught with. Writing style is a fingerprint — these people have read your emails for a decade. And then someone has to turn fifty-odd raw reviews into eight reports a human being can act on, without leaking who said what. The thing you’re paying for is the machine that makes honesty safe, and the writing that makes it land.
We’re not YPO or EO. Does this work for us?
If a consistent group of peers meets on a rhythm and talks about real things (a YPO or EO forum, a self-run group, a mastermind, a partners’ meeting that became something more), it fits. The product assumes roughly five to ten members who’ve watched each other operate. That’s the whole requirement.